<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New National Volunteer Committee Structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoutingnews.org/2008/11/04/new-national-volunteer-committee-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoutingnews.org/2008/11/04/new-national-volunteer-committee-structure/</link>
	<description>Keeping you informed about Scouting!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.scoutingnews.org/2008/11/04/new-national-volunteer-committee-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoutingnews.org/?p=654#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>I was unable to get a real answer about the reorganization.  The party line, we are switching to a functions based organization, rather than a program based organization.

Which in many ways sounds like a good idea.  We will see how it plays out.  It should help the organization as a whole, and hopefully develop a better relationship between Cubs-Boys-Venturing.  Not that its bad now, however I don&#039;t think we work together as well as we should / could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was unable to get a real answer about the reorganization.  The party line, we are switching to a functions based organization, rather than a program based organization.</p>
<p>Which in many ways sounds like a good idea.  We will see how it plays out.  It should help the organization as a whole, and hopefully develop a better relationship between Cubs-Boys-Venturing.  Not that its bad now, however I don&#8217;t think we work together as well as we should / could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Org Chart Art</title>
		<link>http://www.scoutingnews.org/2008/11/04/new-national-volunteer-committee-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Org Chart Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoutingnews.org/?p=654#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan at Scoutingnews.org has a couple of great org charts showing the new structure of Boy Scouts of America&#8217;s paid staff and volunteer network. I&#8217;ve never really paid attention at that level so I&#8217;m not sure how this is different from what we had before. I&#8217;m just waiting to see what this all means, if anything, at the local level. Click on over to see his pretty, and informative, charts. Possibly Related Posts: Girl Scouts - Shrinking or Growing? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan at Scoutingnews.org has a couple of great org charts showing the new structure of Boy Scouts of America&#8217;s paid staff and volunteer network. I&#8217;ve never really paid attention at that level so I&#8217;m not sure how this is different from what we had before. I&#8217;m just waiting to see what this all means, if anything, at the local level. Click on over to see his pretty, and informative, charts. Possibly Related Posts: Girl Scouts &#8211; Shrinking or Growing? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.scoutingnews.org/2008/11/04/new-national-volunteer-committee-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoutingnews.org/?p=654#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Great chart. Did you ever get follow-up on those questions from July about who&#039;s in charge of what aspects of the program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Great chart. Did you ever get follow-up on those questions from July about who&#8217;s in charge of what aspects of the program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
